Quote of the week:
'In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.' - Yogi Berra. (Hat-tip to Ms. Imtiaz)
Commentary of the week:
Seminar Feedback:
As you know, we presented a seminar on our ideas about Islamic Finance to the community at the TARIC masjid this past weekend. It was well attended by lots of men (alas, the sisters don't want to know about money even though they control most of it), who came armed with excellent questions and strong views on the subject. I have received many feedback forms which are full of praise for my good self (that is the official story and I am sticking with it) but they seem to fall into two camps. This divergence is worth analyzing a bit deeply because I think it speaks volumes about human nature. The respective camps are:
1. The Seminar was great. We loved that it was educational, interactive and had nothing to do with products and sales. It made us think, which God knows we don't do enough of.
2. The Seminar was terrible. We already know all we need to know about the idea of Islamic Finance, we want to know about Halal products that we can use right now. We mean NOW. Did we say NOW?
And there you have it - the community has philosophers and it has practical, action-oriented people (credit to our good Sr. Pappano for this insight). The first camp thrives in the world of ideas. The second flourishes in a structured, predictable action-oriented environment. To me the question is not who is right (obviously only I am right), but which section of the community is more dangerous? This is not as simple a question as it sounds, so let me explain a bit.
Like any other industry, Islamic Finance is subject to the whims of Supply and Demand. There is a growing Muslim population (some people say too quickly growing but we will leave that aside for now) and an even larger population of people interested in Ethical Finance. Voices from section 2 (the practical people) demand that their 'needs' (which somehow are the same as everyone else's commercial needs) be met in an Islamic manner. Then others from section 2 also, decide to do something about it and create products and services to Supply the needs of the people who demanded Islamic solutions. Before you know it, thanks to people from section 2, Muslims across the world are demanding Islamic Financial services and the type 2's are in business big-time. But in their rush to produce a new reality and choices for themselves, what have the type 2's really done?
In my opinion (and lots of people tell me I am wrong J), while we have a huge Islamic Finance industry, we have much less Islamic Finance going on (read this again if you didn't get it). As the problem is being both defined and solved by practical, action-oriented people, Islamic Finance is becoming a field of technical sophistication but philosophic bankruptcy. The whole point of Islam was to help instil justice, fairness and a fairly equitable distribution of wealth in society while protecting the balance of Nature. Instead, we have reduced Islam to a tool with which we solve petty financial issues such as credit cards and collateralised loans with which to buy things we cannot afford on our own. There is something deeply elegant about running an economy without debt. This elegance is being tarnished if we think we can 'do Islamic Finance' by removing references to 'interest' in contracts to make things 'Halal'. Our sense of practicality is leading us into waters charted quite well by other communities who got around usury laws using similar tricks in the medieval past.
So what is the solution (cause you know I am one of the practical types that worries about solutions)? All this while, the people from the first section (the philosopher types), have had nothing really to do. They sit around, call the type 2's disrespectful names and are generally cynical and pessimistic about the problems faced by Muslims and people of Faith these days. As they are frequently confused with academics, they feel they no place in the industry and feel left to one side as matters of great import such as the appropriate benchmark rate is determined by the type 2's. This situation is a mistake. Islamic Finance does not belong to the type 2's of the world that want to solve problems NOW, come what may. It belongs really, if there is such a thing as belonging, to the world and all within it as a rich, textured and fundamentally elegant way in which to manage the problems of an economy.
This should include the Type 1's who are struggling with this marginalization at seminars. Every seminar they go to, people ask them for a cheque at the end. The educational, community service aspect of the information is subsumed by the drive for relationships to be commercial and ratified to be so by the transfer of money. This is injustice of a very deep kind. We must allow people to have access to knowledge about Islamic Finance without asking them for money at the end. For the people who attended the session last Saturday and asked for product details, this is why I didn't answer your pointed questions. This particular seminar series is for people who want to discuss ideas. If you want a financial solution to your particular problem, call me at work and I will try and help. Better yet, come to our investment seminars. Don't complain about more education - even the first word of the Holy Book was 'Read'.
For those who missed the seminar, I hope you will come out to the next one. For those who came, I hope you recognize that both you and I are truly blessed to be involved in some manner with Ittihad and this initiative, where there is the freedom to do things with integrity. I look forward to seeing you all the next seminar. For the record, people loved the samosas and the turnout was humbling in terms of both numbers and the intelligence of the discussion. We are a beautiful community with much to contribute to Canada and the world, and I want to thank the administration at TARIC once again for inviting us and having the courage to allow us to engage the community directly on issues where usually their input is just monetary. I look forward (quite shamelessly) to being invited back.
--------------
Upcoming Events:
N/A
__________
Finance News:
1. An interesting analysis of short-sellers (A borrows stock from B, sell lots of it to drive down its price and then buys it back at the lower price. A then returns the stock to B - pocketing the money made in the process). Unfortunately, there are issues in Islam about selling stuff you don't own so this is questionable. A very interesting article nevertheless ... read more here
2. The perils of the joint-ownership strategy for inheritance purposes ... read more here
3. Now the Global Banks are casting aspersions and questioning each other's balance sheets ... read more here
4. The Bank of Canada will accept US treasuries as security for loans ... (Might as well accept rolls of toilet paper too) ... read more here
5. People finally make the connection between Socially Responsible Investing and Islam ... read more here
Economic News:
1. The Future of Energy ... read more here
2. The Washington Post uses the R-word for the US economy ... read more here
3. Good analysis of the disagreements between Central Banks ... read more here
Islamic / Middle East / Emerging Markets:
1. N / A
Interesting but not all Finance:
1. US Company asks US court to use Shariah to decide a claim. I believe this is called Shariah Arbitrage ... (major hat-tip to Mansoor Ullah) - read more here
2. If you are chased by the police, you get to pay for their gas also (hat-tip to Siddiq Mohamed) ... read more here
Showing posts with label Ethical Investing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethical Investing. Show all posts
Monday, July 7, 2008
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Does Ethical Investing Work? (Part II)
Quote of the week:
'Besides being a leader in genetic engineering, Monsanto is one of the largest suppliers of seeds in the world. It also sells the widely used herbicide Roundup, use of which has grown with the adoption of genetically engineered crops resistant to Roundup.' - The NY Times lets slip how the Agri-Food business really works.
The Ittihad Weekly Briefing is now archived at: www.ittihadsecurities.blogspot.com
Commentary of the week:
Does Ethical Investing Work? (Part II - contd. from the last issue):
As promised, this week sees us beginning to tackle the idea of Ethical or Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), which are actually slightly different from each other but which I will knowingly treat as two peas in a pod for the purpose of most of our discussion. The actual difference is that SRI is typically a negative screen which roots out bad apples in the corporate sector, whereas Ethical Investing is a search for the 'good apples' in the stock market in which we can invest. For the purposes of our discussion today, think of them as identical twins - they might be different in theory, but to us they look the same (this is called the problem of reductionism in logic - a severe logical fallacy for lesser mortals).
As we discussed last week, one of severest problems we face as people who believe that we are responsible and accountable for our wealth (or debts), not just our actions - is the inability to control what uses our funds are put to if we plug into the conventional financial system in any meaningful way. Given that we 'need' to have mortgages, savings, credit cards etc. simply in order to live 'normally', how are we to ensure that the hard-earned money we earn and save for our kids is not actually going towards poisoning the very Earth and the water that will be left for our Grand-kids? In a system that functions according to its own value-less logic, how do we live and function with the values that we do have without feeling like hypocrites who talk a lot but whose money is still part of the problem. After all, nobody really believes that we should spread poisons like cyanide in their own backyard, so then why is okay if it is done 2000 km away (and we ignore it) if the rivers will simply carry it to your neighbourhood (if not your cousin's) in a matter of weeks? How much is clean water really worth? The economists of the world have a really good answer to this question - so good that it is not even worth discussing.
Our answer has to be different. We must of course, begin to impose some limits (did someone say values) on how capital is taken from our savings, put into companies that do damage, and then given back to us in a sanitized manner without us really knowing what it has been up to in the meantime. This is the moral disintermediation problem we discussed two weeks ago and even though I was away for more than a whole week, I return to see it still has not been solved (come on people ...).
One possible proposed solution has been the movement towards Socially Responsible (SRI) or Ethical Investing. This is the movement where individuals and investment companies screen and focus their investment activities by first screening out 'bad' corporate citizens from their portfolios and then investing instead in companies that are either improving their image or practices, as the case may be. This is supposed to have two effects (at least). One, it signals to companies and governments (perhaps) that they need to have policies and governance mechanisms in place that will protect egregious abuses and that someone is always watching. Two, it is supposed to deny capital to the 'bad' companies and deny much needed liquidity to their shares in the stock markets so that the stock collapses and the company is sold to someone with a better handle on both business and morals.
This sectors has now grown to over $500B in Canada (which is big) and there seems to be a groundswell of interest in the subject. People from all backgrounds are now asking their financial advisor questions about whether there is anything available which makes them money and is also not damaging to the environment. God only knows how this question is being handled in your household my advisor is very shifty with his answers. One suspects that he knows less about this sector that he lets on, but I digress (and embellish). The question for us is whether SRI does what it intends to do? Does SRI solve the problem of disintermediation? Does it signal the right thing to companies? Does it deny capital to corporate offenders?
The answers to these questions are, from my humble perspective - Yes and no, no, yes & then finally - no. Clear as mud? Let me explain. SRI as a sector is only partly successful (to date) given its intentions. It does not solve the problem of moral disintermediation because we still do not know what our money is up to and where it actually goes (transparency is still an issue). It does signal extremely well to companies that investors are waking up, but ultimately it does not really deny capital to companies with faulty records and dubious future plans. This is because the top holdings for many SRI funds and portfolios in Canada are the banks. This would not ordinarily be a problem except for the fact that in Canada, the banks are actually the largest producers and channels of capital (no, not the government). Even though some investment capital is moving away from companies directly, the same investment capital finds its way to companies through the banks in the form of debt instead. The SRI fund invests in a new offering of bank shares, the bank turns around and loans this money to Company G. Cyanide still finds its way into the water supply. The difference though, is that Company G has a more difficult time (sometimes) selling its shares. Is this success?
Of course, it is too early to say and I think that we should all as people still investigate it for ourselves, but in my opinion, and I fully recognize that I am both a bit weird and in the minority, but we need something a little more drastic. At the very least, the SRI sector needs to begin to demand that the banks begin to include SRI considerations in their loan criteria. That will send shockwaves through the corporate board-rooms where the environment is considered little more than a garbage dump because they know they can always get a bigger loan. It will also begin to address the seriousness of the situation in a way that will change practices quickly, rather than at the leisurely pace that things are usually done in Canada. Of course, as believers, we do not think that the banks' business models are good for society at all, but that is no reason to think that they could not have better practices than they do at the moment. I leave it up to you to decode where IF fits into all this, but from my perspective, we really have to stop thinking about just money when we talk about money. As thinking, feeling people, we are called to a deeper existence.
--------------
Upcoming Events:
We have been invited by TARIC mosque (located here) to present our views on Islamic Finance on Saturday, the 21st of June at 7:00 pm. I encourage everyone to attend with friends as the discussion will focus on the place that Islam does or does not have in our financial choices. By the end of the discussion, attendees should have a good idea about how to judge the IF field for themselves. This is a discussion that will IA take place outside the logic of a sales presentation so you can leave your cheque-books at home, we will accept Halal Credit Cards instead (Relax, I'm kidding). Come with friends and come with difficult questions - hopefully, we will trade in good ideas that will profit our minds.
__________
Finance News:
1. Wonderful Q/A session with a serial entrepreneur (hat-tip to K Niazi) ... read more here
2. Remember how Dr. Yunus from Bangladesh got the Nobel Prize for Micro-finance a few years ago? Well, this article looks at some recent happenings in the world of Micro-finance. I believe the word used was 'shocking' ... read more here
Economic News:
1. The Economist's analysis of the prospects for the Oil markets ... read more here
2. House prices fall faster than in the depression ... read more here
3. Some insights about what drives Innovation in an economy ... read more here
4. The companies whose tinkering with our food supply contributed to the food crisis in the first place now say they have a solution ... this news is most disturbing ... read more here
Islamic / Middle East / Emerging Markets:
1. In case you were still wondering where Oil Money usually goes ... read more here
2. The definitive and final reason on why Japan is the absolute and most advanced civilization on Earth (ever) ... read more here
Interesting but not all Finance:
1. In case you're wondering where to go for the summer ... read more here
2. A new way to clean up oil spills? ... read more here
3. A new site to help you analyze your business ... read more here
4. A wonderful play about a girl from the US who died under tragic circumstances in Palestine recently. A must see for those interested in how wars affect people's livelihoods and why Ethical Investing has an aversion to investing in defence related industries ... read more here
'Besides being a leader in genetic engineering, Monsanto is one of the largest suppliers of seeds in the world. It also sells the widely used herbicide Roundup, use of which has grown with the adoption of genetically engineered crops resistant to Roundup.' - The NY Times lets slip how the Agri-Food business really works.
The Ittihad Weekly Briefing is now archived at: www.ittihadsecurities.blogspot.com
Commentary of the week:
Does Ethical Investing Work? (Part II - contd. from the last issue):
As promised, this week sees us beginning to tackle the idea of Ethical or Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), which are actually slightly different from each other but which I will knowingly treat as two peas in a pod for the purpose of most of our discussion. The actual difference is that SRI is typically a negative screen which roots out bad apples in the corporate sector, whereas Ethical Investing is a search for the 'good apples' in the stock market in which we can invest. For the purposes of our discussion today, think of them as identical twins - they might be different in theory, but to us they look the same (this is called the problem of reductionism in logic - a severe logical fallacy for lesser mortals).
As we discussed last week, one of severest problems we face as people who believe that we are responsible and accountable for our wealth (or debts), not just our actions - is the inability to control what uses our funds are put to if we plug into the conventional financial system in any meaningful way. Given that we 'need' to have mortgages, savings, credit cards etc. simply in order to live 'normally', how are we to ensure that the hard-earned money we earn and save for our kids is not actually going towards poisoning the very Earth and the water that will be left for our Grand-kids? In a system that functions according to its own value-less logic, how do we live and function with the values that we do have without feeling like hypocrites who talk a lot but whose money is still part of the problem. After all, nobody really believes that we should spread poisons like cyanide in their own backyard, so then why is okay if it is done 2000 km away (and we ignore it) if the rivers will simply carry it to your neighbourhood (if not your cousin's) in a matter of weeks? How much is clean water really worth? The economists of the world have a really good answer to this question - so good that it is not even worth discussing.
Our answer has to be different. We must of course, begin to impose some limits (did someone say values) on how capital is taken from our savings, put into companies that do damage, and then given back to us in a sanitized manner without us really knowing what it has been up to in the meantime. This is the moral disintermediation problem we discussed two weeks ago and even though I was away for more than a whole week, I return to see it still has not been solved (come on people ...).
One possible proposed solution has been the movement towards Socially Responsible (SRI) or Ethical Investing. This is the movement where individuals and investment companies screen and focus their investment activities by first screening out 'bad' corporate citizens from their portfolios and then investing instead in companies that are either improving their image or practices, as the case may be. This is supposed to have two effects (at least). One, it signals to companies and governments (perhaps) that they need to have policies and governance mechanisms in place that will protect egregious abuses and that someone is always watching. Two, it is supposed to deny capital to the 'bad' companies and deny much needed liquidity to their shares in the stock markets so that the stock collapses and the company is sold to someone with a better handle on both business and morals.
This sectors has now grown to over $500B in Canada (which is big) and there seems to be a groundswell of interest in the subject. People from all backgrounds are now asking their financial advisor questions about whether there is anything available which makes them money and is also not damaging to the environment. God only knows how this question is being handled in your household my advisor is very shifty with his answers. One suspects that he knows less about this sector that he lets on, but I digress (and embellish). The question for us is whether SRI does what it intends to do? Does SRI solve the problem of disintermediation? Does it signal the right thing to companies? Does it deny capital to corporate offenders?
The answers to these questions are, from my humble perspective - Yes and no, no, yes & then finally - no. Clear as mud? Let me explain. SRI as a sector is only partly successful (to date) given its intentions. It does not solve the problem of moral disintermediation because we still do not know what our money is up to and where it actually goes (transparency is still an issue). It does signal extremely well to companies that investors are waking up, but ultimately it does not really deny capital to companies with faulty records and dubious future plans. This is because the top holdings for many SRI funds and portfolios in Canada are the banks. This would not ordinarily be a problem except for the fact that in Canada, the banks are actually the largest producers and channels of capital (no, not the government). Even though some investment capital is moving away from companies directly, the same investment capital finds its way to companies through the banks in the form of debt instead. The SRI fund invests in a new offering of bank shares, the bank turns around and loans this money to Company G. Cyanide still finds its way into the water supply. The difference though, is that Company G has a more difficult time (sometimes) selling its shares. Is this success?
Of course, it is too early to say and I think that we should all as people still investigate it for ourselves, but in my opinion, and I fully recognize that I am both a bit weird and in the minority, but we need something a little more drastic. At the very least, the SRI sector needs to begin to demand that the banks begin to include SRI considerations in their loan criteria. That will send shockwaves through the corporate board-rooms where the environment is considered little more than a garbage dump because they know they can always get a bigger loan. It will also begin to address the seriousness of the situation in a way that will change practices quickly, rather than at the leisurely pace that things are usually done in Canada. Of course, as believers, we do not think that the banks' business models are good for society at all, but that is no reason to think that they could not have better practices than they do at the moment. I leave it up to you to decode where IF fits into all this, but from my perspective, we really have to stop thinking about just money when we talk about money. As thinking, feeling people, we are called to a deeper existence.
--------------
Upcoming Events:
We have been invited by TARIC mosque (located here) to present our views on Islamic Finance on Saturday, the 21st of June at 7:00 pm. I encourage everyone to attend with friends as the discussion will focus on the place that Islam does or does not have in our financial choices. By the end of the discussion, attendees should have a good idea about how to judge the IF field for themselves. This is a discussion that will IA take place outside the logic of a sales presentation so you can leave your cheque-books at home, we will accept Halal Credit Cards instead (Relax, I'm kidding). Come with friends and come with difficult questions - hopefully, we will trade in good ideas that will profit our minds.
__________
Finance News:
1. Wonderful Q/A session with a serial entrepreneur (hat-tip to K Niazi) ... read more here
2. Remember how Dr. Yunus from Bangladesh got the Nobel Prize for Micro-finance a few years ago? Well, this article looks at some recent happenings in the world of Micro-finance. I believe the word used was 'shocking' ... read more here
Economic News:
1. The Economist's analysis of the prospects for the Oil markets ... read more here
2. House prices fall faster than in the depression ... read more here
3. Some insights about what drives Innovation in an economy ... read more here
4. The companies whose tinkering with our food supply contributed to the food crisis in the first place now say they have a solution ... this news is most disturbing ... read more here
Islamic / Middle East / Emerging Markets:
1. In case you were still wondering where Oil Money usually goes ... read more here
2. The definitive and final reason on why Japan is the absolute and most advanced civilization on Earth (ever) ... read more here
Interesting but not all Finance:
1. In case you're wondering where to go for the summer ... read more here
2. A new way to clean up oil spills? ... read more here
3. A new site to help you analyze your business ... read more here
4. A wonderful play about a girl from the US who died under tragic circumstances in Palestine recently. A must see for those interested in how wars affect people's livelihoods and why Ethical Investing has an aversion to investing in defence related industries ... read more here
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Investing and Ethical Investing (Part I)
Quote of the week:
'It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it.' - Oscar Wilde
The Ittihad Weekly Briefing is now archived at: www.ittihadsecurities.blogspot.com
Commentary of the week:
Difference between Investing & Ethical Investing (Part I):
For regular readers of the briefing, you all know how I usually nitpick and split hairs in order to arrive at any deep insight (or any insight for that matter). This week is a bit different, and it is not some esoteric minutiae of finance that is under discussion but rather what we do with our money on a practical basis all day, every day, all night, every night - for even though we are all sleeping, the stereotypical financial corporation is wide awake and thinking of your money. I don't mean this is a bad way of course, you all know by now how deeply I respect the world of finance (hmm). I just mean that even though you think your money is safely laying golden eggs in a bank account, GIC, mutual fund, hedge fund, LP, Stock or Bond, it is actually nowhere close to any such entity. It is lost in a sea of electrons, moving from your corner bank branch, brokerage or financial advisor, through public markets such as the TSX and into and out of the pockets of actual people and companies again somewhere else, only to show up on your bank / investment statement at the required end of the month exactly as scheduled. In this sense, your dollars are like me when I was in high school: registered, but not always present (ah, those were the days).
For example, if you invest in a mutual fund and the mutual fund participates in the IPO of a mining company, then a portion of your money has actually found its way into the coffers of the mining company. Let us then also suppose that this Gold Mining company is imaginatively called Company G. A portion of that portion then, went into the purchase and use of cyanide (yes, the poison) which is used in the separation the gold from the sulphurous rocks in which it is usually found. This cyanide then, after the gold has been extracted, then finds its way sometimes (some say always, it is only a matter of time) into the local water supply. Company G then gets sued and in order to protect your hard earned savings from seizure in legal claims, you now find yourself on the wrong side of a legal case involving poor farmers from some foreign country whose livestock and children are sadly no more and whose lands are no longer safe for the growing of food. Your financial health and moral imperative are now in conflict and this causes you great trouble. You read about the issue, go the Annual General Meeting (AGM) and demand that the company change its practices and begins to use a safer chemical than cyanide for the extraction of Gold. But wait a second, you are not a shareholder of the company. What!!!, you ask? How can that be? They have your money after all and surely you can do something to make them stop poisoning the Earth, can't you? Alas, my friends, you invested in a brand name mutual fund, not in Company G. Not only do you not know which companies you have invested in beyond the top ten, you also do not know which countries each of those then are involved in and what it is that they do once they are there. After all, you need to see the 10+% return on investment every year that the Financial Advisor promised you and also, you are not in finance - so how is all this your problem? Surely, someone else is supposed to be making sure your money is spent in good things while making good money. Isn't that why you pay your advisors? (and trust me, you do pay).
Excellent answer. This is indeed not your problem because you cannot solve it. Your mutual fund solves this dilemma for you quite neatly. You neither ask what it is that they do with your money and they oblige your intense curiosity by not telling you. But even if they did tell you, what could you do? You are not a full shareholder in the companies in which you have invested. You are just a unit-holder of the mutual fund. The mutual fund doesn't have the mandate to actually prevent the use of cyanide even if they knew what the devil it was; the mutual fund wants the company to extract as much gold as possible for the least amount of costs without getting into too much trouble with the authorities. You provide the money, the bank provides a loan, the mutual fund provides 'intermediation', the government(s) provides the mining license and company G provides the returns. The farmers provide just collateral damage. Since they are not Canadian / American / European and they don't make the 6:00 pm news and because Company G has great lawyers and a large advertising budget that keeps the story from getting to us - you and I don't have to think about where the returns came from. All parties are able to sleep at night without use of Xanax, except for the poor farmers for whom all sleep is short and whose insomnia is spent in remembrance of that which brought them such joy in a land that existed a long time ago.
This, in a nutshell is called Investing. While I have picked (perhaps unfairly) on mutual funds and mining this week, this story applies to other sectors and savings / investment vehicles as well. Also, the major point here is not that mining is terrible (which it might well be), but that we are constantly plugged into a system (for lack of a better word that describes the movement of money) that has no moral values as such. I say this because any moral outcome that results is little more than an accident. As people, we all have some moral code we follow, yet our finances are strangely liberated from this need to be good. There is in the financial sector no aim greater than that of taking some money and making some more money out of it. This is the sole measure of success. Back when I was a psychology student a few decades ago, having no values was considered psychopathic. Now that I am a student of finance, having no values is called efficiency.
Nevertheless, I don't say all this to make you depressed. We have to get over ourselves and our petty emotions, we have to pray for those we have hurt unknowingly and think deeply about how we want to move forward (and then perhaps actually move forward). The whole problem with humanity is that when we see a complex problem, we lose heart even before we understand all of it. We need realistic, determined enthusiasm driven by something approaching Love to change the world (even if that makes you nervous). We do not need the half-hearted, depressional funk that people like me can get you into so easily. We must never allow the search for an accurate description of our circumstances to confuse our internal apparatus of hope - each has its place in life. Wake up, shape up & grow up - more rests on our attitude towards life than on our money.
Next, we shall have to tackle Ethical Investing - which some people say is the antidote to moral disintermediation in finance. In the meantime, enjoy the caviar at the next AGM - it is the least damage we can do to the companies we 'own' but have no sway over.
The IWB will return two weeks from now IA as I will be away on vacation. Be good, make me proud, write some responses on the Blog and start a conversation amongst yourselves.
--------------
Upcoming Events:
The Crescent Entrepreneurial Association (CEA) is hosting a business plan competition that I think many of you will enjoy attending. This is a volunteer organization that is helping the community get a better handle on its economic future. The exposure and insights gained at the competition will be quite priceless IA so if you have daughters, sons, younger nieces and nephews, cousins etc., try and bring them out to this event on the 31st of May. We at Ittihad are both fans and supporters of CEA and would like to see a large turnout. This wonderful organization will help the community build a critical mass of good, ethical businesses that will contribute to society IA. Please register here.
We have been invited by TARIC mosque (located here) to present our views on Islamic Finance on Saturday, the 21st of June at 7:00 pm. I encourage everyone to attend with friends as the discussion will focus on the place that Islam does or does not have in our financial choices. By the end of the discussion, attendees should have a good idea about how to judge the IF field for themselves. This is a discussion that will IA take place outside the logic of a sales presentation so you can leave your cheque-books at home, we will accept Halal Credit Cards instead (Relax, I'm kidding). Come with friends and come with difficult questions - hopefully, we will trade in good ideas that will profit our minds.
__________
Finance News:
1. Five steps to a better financial future ... read more here
2. The Guardian's introduction to Ethical Investing (hat-tip Br. Alim) ... read more here
3. Investing in inflationary times ... read more here
Economic News:
1. The Fed raises their inflation projections. Did someone finally send them the Ittihad Weekly? ... read more here
2. An extremely disturbing (if you are a consumer) development on the Oil front. Seems that futures prices have increased so much that even the Oil companies want to start stockpiling oil rather than selling it ... this should be an interesting political battle. No way the consumer can win this one with the kinds of spineless politicians we have ... read more here
3. A great short article on the interplay between the US$ and Chinese Yuan ... read more here
4. Outlook for the Real Estate and Housing in different countries ... read more here
5. One usually doesn't publicize such things, but I feel a bit like Mary Poppins must have when she opened up her umbrella and flew around town. The IWB of three weeks ago makes the cover of the Economist ... read more here
Islamic / Middle East / Emerging Markets:
1. N/A
Interesting but not all Finance:
1. Is mining still ethical if some lakes are destroyed? ... read more here
1. This is what happens to fertilizers after we use them so liberally to grow mostly bland food ... read more here
2. Brazil's minister for the environment resigns, but her life story is quite inspiring (although too short) ... read more here
3. Getting energy from Garbage ... read more here
'It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it.' - Oscar Wilde
The Ittihad Weekly Briefing is now archived at: www.ittihadsecurities.blogspot.com
Commentary of the week:
Difference between Investing & Ethical Investing (Part I):
For regular readers of the briefing, you all know how I usually nitpick and split hairs in order to arrive at any deep insight (or any insight for that matter). This week is a bit different, and it is not some esoteric minutiae of finance that is under discussion but rather what we do with our money on a practical basis all day, every day, all night, every night - for even though we are all sleeping, the stereotypical financial corporation is wide awake and thinking of your money. I don't mean this is a bad way of course, you all know by now how deeply I respect the world of finance (hmm). I just mean that even though you think your money is safely laying golden eggs in a bank account, GIC, mutual fund, hedge fund, LP, Stock or Bond, it is actually nowhere close to any such entity. It is lost in a sea of electrons, moving from your corner bank branch, brokerage or financial advisor, through public markets such as the TSX and into and out of the pockets of actual people and companies again somewhere else, only to show up on your bank / investment statement at the required end of the month exactly as scheduled. In this sense, your dollars are like me when I was in high school: registered, but not always present (ah, those were the days).
For example, if you invest in a mutual fund and the mutual fund participates in the IPO of a mining company, then a portion of your money has actually found its way into the coffers of the mining company. Let us then also suppose that this Gold Mining company is imaginatively called Company G. A portion of that portion then, went into the purchase and use of cyanide (yes, the poison) which is used in the separation the gold from the sulphurous rocks in which it is usually found. This cyanide then, after the gold has been extracted, then finds its way sometimes (some say always, it is only a matter of time) into the local water supply. Company G then gets sued and in order to protect your hard earned savings from seizure in legal claims, you now find yourself on the wrong side of a legal case involving poor farmers from some foreign country whose livestock and children are sadly no more and whose lands are no longer safe for the growing of food. Your financial health and moral imperative are now in conflict and this causes you great trouble. You read about the issue, go the Annual General Meeting (AGM) and demand that the company change its practices and begins to use a safer chemical than cyanide for the extraction of Gold. But wait a second, you are not a shareholder of the company. What!!!, you ask? How can that be? They have your money after all and surely you can do something to make them stop poisoning the Earth, can't you? Alas, my friends, you invested in a brand name mutual fund, not in Company G. Not only do you not know which companies you have invested in beyond the top ten, you also do not know which countries each of those then are involved in and what it is that they do once they are there. After all, you need to see the 10+% return on investment every year that the Financial Advisor promised you and also, you are not in finance - so how is all this your problem? Surely, someone else is supposed to be making sure your money is spent in good things while making good money. Isn't that why you pay your advisors? (and trust me, you do pay).
Excellent answer. This is indeed not your problem because you cannot solve it. Your mutual fund solves this dilemma for you quite neatly. You neither ask what it is that they do with your money and they oblige your intense curiosity by not telling you. But even if they did tell you, what could you do? You are not a full shareholder in the companies in which you have invested. You are just a unit-holder of the mutual fund. The mutual fund doesn't have the mandate to actually prevent the use of cyanide even if they knew what the devil it was; the mutual fund wants the company to extract as much gold as possible for the least amount of costs without getting into too much trouble with the authorities. You provide the money, the bank provides a loan, the mutual fund provides 'intermediation', the government(s) provides the mining license and company G provides the returns. The farmers provide just collateral damage. Since they are not Canadian / American / European and they don't make the 6:00 pm news and because Company G has great lawyers and a large advertising budget that keeps the story from getting to us - you and I don't have to think about where the returns came from. All parties are able to sleep at night without use of Xanax, except for the poor farmers for whom all sleep is short and whose insomnia is spent in remembrance of that which brought them such joy in a land that existed a long time ago.
This, in a nutshell is called Investing. While I have picked (perhaps unfairly) on mutual funds and mining this week, this story applies to other sectors and savings / investment vehicles as well. Also, the major point here is not that mining is terrible (which it might well be), but that we are constantly plugged into a system (for lack of a better word that describes the movement of money) that has no moral values as such. I say this because any moral outcome that results is little more than an accident. As people, we all have some moral code we follow, yet our finances are strangely liberated from this need to be good. There is in the financial sector no aim greater than that of taking some money and making some more money out of it. This is the sole measure of success. Back when I was a psychology student a few decades ago, having no values was considered psychopathic. Now that I am a student of finance, having no values is called efficiency.
Nevertheless, I don't say all this to make you depressed. We have to get over ourselves and our petty emotions, we have to pray for those we have hurt unknowingly and think deeply about how we want to move forward (and then perhaps actually move forward). The whole problem with humanity is that when we see a complex problem, we lose heart even before we understand all of it. We need realistic, determined enthusiasm driven by something approaching Love to change the world (even if that makes you nervous). We do not need the half-hearted, depressional funk that people like me can get you into so easily. We must never allow the search for an accurate description of our circumstances to confuse our internal apparatus of hope - each has its place in life. Wake up, shape up & grow up - more rests on our attitude towards life than on our money.
Next, we shall have to tackle Ethical Investing - which some people say is the antidote to moral disintermediation in finance. In the meantime, enjoy the caviar at the next AGM - it is the least damage we can do to the companies we 'own' but have no sway over.
The IWB will return two weeks from now IA as I will be away on vacation. Be good, make me proud, write some responses on the Blog and start a conversation amongst yourselves.
--------------
Upcoming Events:
The Crescent Entrepreneurial Association (CEA) is hosting a business plan competition that I think many of you will enjoy attending. This is a volunteer organization that is helping the community get a better handle on its economic future. The exposure and insights gained at the competition will be quite priceless IA so if you have daughters, sons, younger nieces and nephews, cousins etc., try and bring them out to this event on the 31st of May. We at Ittihad are both fans and supporters of CEA and would like to see a large turnout. This wonderful organization will help the community build a critical mass of good, ethical businesses that will contribute to society IA. Please register here.
We have been invited by TARIC mosque (located here) to present our views on Islamic Finance on Saturday, the 21st of June at 7:00 pm. I encourage everyone to attend with friends as the discussion will focus on the place that Islam does or does not have in our financial choices. By the end of the discussion, attendees should have a good idea about how to judge the IF field for themselves. This is a discussion that will IA take place outside the logic of a sales presentation so you can leave your cheque-books at home, we will accept Halal Credit Cards instead (Relax, I'm kidding). Come with friends and come with difficult questions - hopefully, we will trade in good ideas that will profit our minds.
__________
Finance News:
1. Five steps to a better financial future ... read more here
2. The Guardian's introduction to Ethical Investing (hat-tip Br. Alim) ... read more here
3. Investing in inflationary times ... read more here
Economic News:
1. The Fed raises their inflation projections. Did someone finally send them the Ittihad Weekly? ... read more here
2. An extremely disturbing (if you are a consumer) development on the Oil front. Seems that futures prices have increased so much that even the Oil companies want to start stockpiling oil rather than selling it ... this should be an interesting political battle. No way the consumer can win this one with the kinds of spineless politicians we have ... read more here
3. A great short article on the interplay between the US$ and Chinese Yuan ... read more here
4. Outlook for the Real Estate and Housing in different countries ... read more here
5. One usually doesn't publicize such things, but I feel a bit like Mary Poppins must have when she opened up her umbrella and flew around town. The IWB of three weeks ago makes the cover of the Economist ... read more here
Islamic / Middle East / Emerging Markets:
1. N/A
Interesting but not all Finance:
1. Is mining still ethical if some lakes are destroyed? ... read more here
1. This is what happens to fertilizers after we use them so liberally to grow mostly bland food ... read more here
2. Brazil's minister for the environment resigns, but her life story is quite inspiring (although too short) ... read more here
3. Getting energy from Garbage ... read more here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)